Update the recipe url to the new format

[leofang]

The recipe should be updated to follow the template form as in cuTENSOR/cuSPARSELt:

• https://github.com/conda-forge/cutensor-feedstock/blob/5941a4818f8b2bb4f9e5949f413f787cfa775be7/recipe/meta.yaml#L1-L11
• https://github.com/conda-forge/cusparselt-feedstock/blob/c8c56a6ad88b4d85d1890b6426daa1516b1d0601/recipe/meta.yaml#L1-L10

This would allow the CF bot to pick up the new updates from NVIDIA and send a version update PR to here automatically.

[leofang]

This is done in #56.

[leofang]

I was wondering why this feedstock remains silent since #56... There are a few newer versions already, but the bot didn't send any update.

It turns out the cuDNN team uses a wrong format in the json file (the package build number is mistakenly included in the json filename) and we have no way to check it. It was already raised by another internal team: nvbugs 4056484

[leofang]

By json files I refer to those under https://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cudnn/redist/.

[jakirkham]

Is it worth raising as an upstream issue?

[jakirkham]

Tried requesting a bot update ( #74 ) to see what would happen, it opened PR ( #75 ) and promptly failed. Details about the failure in this comment: #75 (comment)

Think cuda_major is confusing for the bot. Though there may not be enough information for the bot to go off of either

cudnn-feedstock/recipe/meta.yaml

Line 2 in 34726d4

{% set cuda_major = (cuda_compiler_version|default("12.0.0")).split(".")[0] %}

Edit: The bot is also pinning to CUDA 11.0 ( #75 (comment) ), which causes issues

[jakirkham]

Did spot one issue: #76

Fixing with PR: #77

Not sure if that is enough to fix this issue, but we can test after that lands

[jakirkham]

The above PR was merged

Tried a fresh version update: #79

Though am still seeing issues with the update. Looks like it may be a different issue though. It is no longer running into issues with cuda_major, but it still doesn't know how to handle CUDA 11 & 12

Edit: More details in this comment: #79 (comment)