[Feature] Improve SEO by Adding Meta Description Tag

[Silvia-Wachira]

Problem

The current HTML head section lacks a meta description tag, which could impact the search engine ranking negatively and make discovering the page difficult. A meta description provides search engines with a concise summary of the page's content, which is used in search result snippets. Adding this tag would improve the page's visibility and provide a better search experience.

Description

This feature involves adding a <meta name="description"> tag in the head section of the HTML document, providing a brief summary of the page content.

Implementation

• would be interested in implementing this feature.

[possumbilities]

We'd need to decide on what this would say before this could move forward. Suggestion?

[Silvia-Wachira]

Explore CC Search Portal , join a global community that supports creativity and sharing of knowledge and discover openly licensed images, music and more.
@possumbilities What do you think?

[LavellTheDev]

@possumbilities
A suggestion,

Explore Creative Commons, a global community that supports the access, legal sharing and collaboration of creative works worldwide.

[possumbilities]

I'm not sure either of these is a description of what the site is, as much as it is a call to action for a larger more general thing.

I think the second is getting closer than the first suggestion, but a description would do well to capture what the site is, and what it does; and not just a tagline/slogan or call to action.

It also shouldn't be overly general either.

[Silvia-Wachira]

Let me look for another example

[Silvia-Wachira]

Discover the Creative Commons Search Portal, a platform for creators to find and use openly licensed images, music, and other media. Empowering legal sharing and innovation through Creative Commons licenses.
@possumbilities How about this?

[Silvia-Wachira]

The Creative Commons Search Portal helps creators find and use openly licensed images, music, and more. It aggregates content that can be legally shared and reused under Creative Commons licenses

@possumbilities Or this?

[LavellTheDev]

@Silvia-Wachira I think the second one sounds better than the first, but maybe include a little more information about the educational or teaching aspect of creative commons?