graphql-ws to graphql-transport-ws Protocol work #114
Closed
djpritchett
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thank you for warm words. I happy to redirect these words to my team: @sergey-komissarov, @AlexzAK, @denis.sheronov, @herclogon. I believe we will integrate these changes into the master branch and issue a new RC quite soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
big thumbs up for @prokher for updating ([switch-from-graphql-transport-ws-to-graphql-ws-subprotocol])(https://github.com/datadvance/DjangoChannelsGraphqlWs/tree/switch-from-graphql-transport-ws-to-graphql-ws-subprotocol)) the most confusing issue I have ran into in a long while graphql-transport-ws TO graphql-ws subprotocol
which as we know means graphql-ws to graphql-transport-ws
seriously though, thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions