Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Somatic CNA's with tumor purity #360

Open
yashcrux opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Somatic CNA's with tumor purity #360

yashcrux opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@yashcrux
Copy link

yashcrux commented Jan 2, 2024

Hi

I had a question regarding how the tumor purity values are parsed while somatic CNA.
I understand its by using '-t'. I don't understand whether it takes it in percentage or decimal.

For example if the purity is 88%, it shuld be introduced as "-t 88" or "-t 0.88"

Thanks for the help!

@yashcrux yashcrux changed the title Somatic CNV calling with tumor purity Somatic CNA's with tumor purity Jan 2, 2024
@tobiasrausch
Copy link
Member

The -t command-line parameter is indeed somewhat related to tumor purity, ploidy and subclonality. To have maximum flexibility, I so far opted for a simple command-line parameter that determines the min. copy-number shift for the segmentation and somatic classification. For instance, for a diploid tumor with 80% tumor purity, a clonal genomic rearrangement of copy-number 3 would be observed at CN 2.8 = 0.8 * 3 + 0.2 * 2 so you can put a very stringent threshold of -t 0.5. However, for a tetraploid tumor with 30% tumor purity, a clonal genomic rearrangement of copy-number 5 would be observed at CN 4.3 = 0.3 * 5 + 0.7 * 4 so you need to use a very lenient cutoff such as -t 0.2 to detect such a shift in copy-number from 4 to 5.

@tobiasrausch tobiasrausch self-assigned this Jan 10, 2024
@yashcrux
Copy link
Author

Hi Tobias.

Thanks for this explanation!
Also can you please help me understand the relation of CN with -t.

Like what range should I consider to set, in this case, -t 0.5 when CN 2.8 or the other case.
in my case:
I have 2 tumor subtypes :
1st type: the values of CN ranges from 2.5 to 2.95
2nd type: ...CN 3.39 to 3.96

@yashcrux
Copy link
Author

HI Tobias

I read the explanation again and decided on the -t values for :
1st type - 0.5
2nd type - 0.3

I don't know if its correct or I am in the right direction of the understanding of your explanation

Thanks in advance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants