Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kafka client collaboration #122

Open
crepererum opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Kafka client collaboration #122

crepererum opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@crepererum
Copy link

Hi there,

I see you are using rdkafka for your Kafka interaction. We (= InfluxDB IOx) implemented our own pure-Rust async client called rskafka which you might find useful. There is also an intro blog post: https://www.influxdata.com/blog/building-simple-pure-rust-async-apache-kafka-client/

I think you might be missing a feature or two, but nothing fundamental (to my knowledge).

Let me know if you have questions, or want to chat.

Cheers,
Marco

PS: Also feel free to close this ticket.

@houqp
Copy link
Member

houqp commented Aug 15, 2022

Thanks for sharing @crepererum ! I think it would be a cool idea to try rskafka to reduce C dependencies :)

@rtyler rtyler added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 11, 2023
@rtyler
Copy link
Member

rtyler commented May 19, 2023

@crepererum I have been looking over rskafka which seems like it might not be suitable for our use until a time when it supports consumer groups and offset tracking.

Based on the readme in the repository I cannot tell if such contributions would be welcome or not.

@crepererum
Copy link
Author

Based on the readme in the repository I cannot tell if such contributions would be welcome or not.

They are, it's just that we (InfluxData) won't implement them. We can help w/ reviews though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants