You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Author, I reviewed the function "estimate_cell_number_RNA_reads" for estimating the number of cells in each spot, but I couldn't understand the rationale behind the algorithm. It seems that the total UMI counts in each spot are first normalized and then log-transformed. A curve is fitted from this to estimate the cell number for each spot. What I can't understand is: after normalization, the UMI counts in each spot are the same. Wouldn't this step eliminate the differences in cell number? Could you please explain how the proportion of genes in each spot can be used to estimate the cell number? Thanks a lot~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Author, I reviewed the function "estimate_cell_number_RNA_reads" for estimating the number of cells in each spot, but I couldn't understand the rationale behind the algorithm. It seems that the total UMI counts in each spot are first normalized and then log-transformed. A curve is fitted from this to estimate the cell number for each spot. What I can't understand is: after normalization, the UMI counts in each spot are the same. Wouldn't this step eliminate the differences in cell number? Could you please explain how the proportion of genes in each spot can be used to estimate the cell number? Thanks a lot~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: