You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My high-level note (maybe for future upgrade): it looks like this implements point-in-polygon to test whether an object falls within the camera footprint? I'd advocate against implementing this manually -- use an existing (optimized) library. I did a bit of googling and Shapely seems promising (https://www.matecdev.com/posts/point-in-polygon.html, https://pypi.org/project/shapely/).
Alternatively, I have code from LSD that wraps a C implementation (it's fast): https://github.com/EUPSForge/polygon. Hasn't been updated since Python 2.7, but the math hasn't changed :). That said, think of this as a last resort; (much) better to use a strong 3rd-party library.
It would be good to explore these possibilities and see whether these are faster/better optimized than what we currently have implemented in the FOV filter and the FOV edge case filter
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Matplotlib's patches.Patch can do this: https://matplotlib.org/stable/api/_as_gen/matplotlib.patches.Patch.html (contains_points), but my experience is that it's not particularly fast. Is this for the general camera footprint or for each CCD? (In the CCD case, if we can live with the assumption that it's a rectangle in a tangent plane, this can be done very efficiency with, eg, kD trees)
From @mjuric
My high-level note (maybe for future upgrade): it looks like this implements point-in-polygon to test whether an object falls within the camera footprint? I'd advocate against implementing this manually -- use an existing (optimized) library. I did a bit of googling and Shapely seems promising (https://www.matecdev.com/posts/point-in-polygon.html, https://pypi.org/project/shapely/).
Alternatively, I have code from LSD that wraps a C implementation (it's fast): https://github.com/EUPSForge/polygon. Hasn't been updated since Python 2.7, but the math hasn't changed :). That said, think of this as a last resort; (much) better to use a strong 3rd-party library.
It would be good to explore these possibilities and see whether these are faster/better optimized than what we currently have implemented in the FOV filter and the FOV edge case filter
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: