Generated class files are breaking IntelliJ

[andreaTP]

Steps to reproduce:

git clone https://github.com/dylibso/chicory.git
cd chicory
mvn -Dquickly

• open the project in IntelliJ
• open, for example: machine-tests/target/generated-sources/chicory-aot/com/dylibso/chicory/wabt/Wat2WasmMachineFactory.java

You can notice that Wat2Wasm is not recognized by the IDE.

The current workaround to generate a source file Wat2WasmMachineFactory to wrap the generated code masks the issue to the users, but still, it should be great to have a working setup.
Everything works as expected with plain Maven commands.

I attempted to ask for help at the IntelliJ boot at Devoxx, but haven't received a contact back so far.
The issue is completely reproducible, but I have no clue where to start to debug/narrow it down.

Attempting to summon @bashor for guidance on how to progress with this 🙏

[andreaTP]

Cross-linking: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-360628/Generated-class-files-are-breaking-IntelliJ

[bashor]

@andreaTP do I understand correctly that Wat2Wasm should be resolved to class inside wabt/src/main/java/com/dylibso/chicory/wabt/Wat2Wasm.java?

If so:

• A workaround/fix could be adding a dependency to the module explicitly
• Wat2Wasm doesn't have a constructor with Instance as a parameter

[andreaTP]

Thanks a lot for having a look @bashor !

Wat2Wasm is a pure class file generated with ASM, it doesn't have a corresponding .java file associated.
The generated source file Wat2WasmMachineFactory.java is a wrapper to avoid that the IDE breaks in user land, but is correctly using Wat2Wasm as it has a constructor that takes Instance as a parameter.
The problem is that IntelliJ, apparently, doesn't recognize Wat2Wasm at all.

[bashor]

I guess IJ doesn't resolve classes in the output dir of the same module. You can try to put generated files into a separate module and depend on it. Or generate class files into a separate folder and add it to dependencies.

[andreaTP]

Thanks for getting back and the suggestion @bashor , it was my very first attempt, but, unfortunately it doesn't work, you can reproduce on this branch

That said, even if we get this setup to work, I hope we can narrow down the root cause.
This is the developer experience we are giving to the users, and asking to create straightaway 2 sub-modules to achieve the functionality seems not optimal.

[bashor]

Well, adding the directory to dependencies manually via Project Structure seems to work.
Unfortunately, I can't help more here 🤷‍♂️.

[andreaTP]

Thanks a lot for the effort and your help on this @bashor .
One last question, if you don't mind: is it reasonable to expect updates on the YouTrack issue?
Any better alternative to get the ball rolling?

Thanks!

[bashor]

One last question, if you don't mind: is it reasonable to expect updates on the YouTrack issue?

IDK, it's a different team, and I am not aware of their process.
I've set a more specific Subsystem there; let's wait for some time 🤷‍♂️.