Variation compare, differences and which is better? #360
Replies: 5 comments 8 replies
-
Those 3 are the same radio. The only real difference is that 5R have no USB charging, which for me is a no buy.
I don't know if that is model dependent, maybe they are all 1.6 now. The audio is different between boards, not radio models. There were differences even between 1.4 boards, different resistors were used in audio path. The speaker itself is the same. The advertisement is a lie. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I dunno why maybe chips control quality are better on production , but i can assure the UV5R+ headphone sounds much better and receives better than UVK6 -5(8) . On other way the USB charger added on uvk6 dont serve for charge 100% the battery anyone can make the test first . |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
fcc.report.FCC-ID.XBPUV-K5.6401581.pdf
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The Egzumer firmare here on this Github, can function on all types. If your motivation is that you want to understand it electronically and you want to know everything as precisely as possible, then read up carefully. Everything has already been written on internet sites and Telegram and here too there are references to those sites where all hardware is described in detail. With even component lists, component specifications, X-ray photos, parts diagrams, etc. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have the UV-K6 and uv-K5(99) <--- not a typo but rather 1.6 rev. board (newer USB charger chip) in a new case with what look like somewhat better seals. Oh, and they come in 4 trim colors. :) The K6s are 1.4 rev. boards. @andrewtanyinkit, the firmware should tell you the hardware rev., either at powerup or in one of the menu items. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Did anyone simultaneously have three of those variation?
UV-K5
UV-K6 / UV-K5(8)
UV-5R Plus
What's actually the difference of this three beside the very obvious one like the backlight and the shape design, i have using K6 for couple month now a month on stock K6 firmware, a month for others variation stock firmware from quansheng, and couple moth for so many different mod, and finally end up in this custom firmware, and even try to modify some easier code like turning things on and off, and change some others like roger beep tone and the startup version string, my friends considering buying one, but don't know what's the different, i am considering buying another too, so i can have one for stable everyday use, one for testing all kind of modification, does this three really have different? did the K6's speaker is really better then K5 like the quansheng advertise? if there is really some different, which one will you chose or which one do you think is better?
BTW, i know there is others brand that take this radio from quansheng and slap their logo on it, but i assume everyone with the same design is the same as the original quansheng version, eg. the retevis RA79 is basically a K5,and others, but if anyone have variation from others brand and experience that there has different, please let me know, so i can take it to my consideration.
15 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions