Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

input_reads vs full_len_reads in differential_expression() #112

Open
mehc555 opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

input_reads vs full_len_reads in differential_expression() #112

mehc555 opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@mehc555
Copy link

mehc555 commented Aug 16, 2024

Ask away!

Hi,

In main.nf, input_reads is fed to differential_expression() and in differential_expression.nf the workflow differential_expression {} has full_len_reads defined. I've seen workflows that use pychopper reads and then align and quantify gene expr. Here are all input reads used then, or am I wrongly interpreting this?

Thank you

@mehc555 mehc555 added the question Further information is requested label Aug 16, 2024
@sarahjeeeze
Copy link
Contributor

sarahjeeeze commented Aug 20, 2024

Hi, you are correct- thanks for pointing this out we will look in to seeing if it makes sense to update it to use the reads output by pychopper for DE_analysis. This only makes a difference for the direct_rna mode.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants