You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Downstream tooling requires each proposal be merged as a Draft first, then move to Review. If the proposal appears first in Review, it messes up statistics.
eip-review-bot currently flags any such proposals as e-consensus and requires half of all editors (rounded down) to approve. Would you prefer alternative behavior?
I suppose, we can use a message for the author/reviewer with the "reason for the flag" will be helpful.
Something like "No Draft available in EIPs/ERCs repository" for a PR requesting to be added as a Review instead of Draft. It will help authors & reviewers of PRs like this and it could be merged with an appropriate status.
If possible, this check should be made available for all statuses. As similar issue of missing a status (Review) was also noticed here with a Meta EIP.
Downstream tooling requires each proposal be merged as a Draft first, then move to Review. If the proposal appears first in Review, it messes up statistics.
Originally reported by @poojaranjan on discord.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: