You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For some reason the mentioned feature is only discovered for IOB_Y1, but not for IOB_Y0.
What seems to cause this is that the bit 39_127 from the manually identified feature RIOB18.IOB_Y0.SSTL12_SSTL135_SSTL15.IN !38_126 39_127
disappears, when we have a differential input on IOB_Y0 (but not on IOB_Y1).
This creates a contradiction which makes segmatch report 0 candidates.
So, unfortunately currently we are inserting the mentioned feature manually in the Makefile,
which is a hack. It would be better to find out, how we could modify the fuzzer to find
the mentioned feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For some reason the mentioned feature is only discovered for IOB_Y1, but not for IOB_Y0.
What seems to cause this is that the bit 39_127 from the manually identified feature
RIOB18.IOB_Y0.SSTL12_SSTL135_SSTL15.IN !38_126 39_127
disappears, when we have a differential input on IOB_Y0 (but not on IOB_Y1).
This creates a contradiction which makes segmatch report 0 candidates.
The python script to examine this and its output are attached here:
findsegbug.py.gz
result.txt
So, unfortunately currently we are inserting the mentioned feature manually in the Makefile,
which is a hack. It would be better to find out, how we could modify the fuzzer to find
the mentioned feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: