Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate fluentd-website to GitHub Pages #173

Open
fujimotos opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Migrate fluentd-website to GitHub Pages #173

fujimotos opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@fujimotos
Copy link
Member

This proposal discusses the future of https://fluentd.org.

Background

  • Fluentd.org is important part of Fluentd. Most users access, research and download Fluentd from that site.
  • Nevertheless, it is currently under-maintained. Most contents are left as-is since circa 2012.
  • Moreover, it is unnecessarily hard to manage --- built as a Ruby application, although it's really just a static site.

The Proposal

  • MIgrate the web hosting to GitHub Pages.
  • Use static site generator (such as sphinx) to generate the static HTML.

Security Discussion

  • This proposal should greatly improve the securiy of fluentd.org.
  • The web hosting stack gets a automatic security update by GitHub.
  • We don't need to keep updating heroku/puma and others any more (i.e. Need to upgrade Heroku stack #121).
@fujimotos fujimotos self-assigned this Feb 7, 2022
@fujimotos fujimotos moved this to Future work in Fluentd Kanban Feb 7, 2022
@agup006
Copy link
Member

agup006 commented Jun 30, 2022

I think we should completely revamp the Fluentd site

@fujimotos
Copy link
Member Author

I think we should completely revamp the Fluentd site

Do you have any design idea? We basically need to do:

  1. A good design template (HTML templates + CSS).
  2. Migrate existing contents to new design.
  3. Publish the new site.
  4. Switch https://fluentd.org to the new site.

Maybe I can cooperate with you to make it happen.

@adithyaakrishna
Copy link
Contributor

@agup006 @fujimotos I would like to work on this 👀

What's your thought on using Static Site Generators? Eg. Docusaurus
I have made a detailed comparison of different SSGs here at, https://github.com/adithyaakrishna/Analyze-SSG

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants