Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Core feature] Add --copy none to pyflyte run --remote #5883

Open
2 tasks done
thomasjpfan opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks done

[Core feature] Add --copy none to pyflyte run --remote #5883

thomasjpfan opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request flytekit FlyteKit Python related issue

Comments

@thomasjpfan
Copy link
Member

Motivation: Why do you think this is important?

If you are using pyflyte run --remote with ImageSpec and source_root, then the copy mode is LOADED_MODULES. This means that during image build time the files are injected into the image itself. This means that we do not need to use fast-registration anymore.

Goal: What should the final outcome look like, ideally?

Allow for pyflyte run --remote --copy none

Describe alternatives you've considered

Do not introduce the feature. This means that the same files will be in the image and also be downloaded during pyflyte-fast-execute.

Propose: Link/Inline OR Additional context

No response

Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already?

  • Yes

Have you read the Code of Conduct?

  • Yes
@thomasjpfan thomasjpfan added enhancement New feature or request untriaged This issues has not yet been looked at by the Maintainers flytekit FlyteKit Python related issue labels Oct 21, 2024
@eapolinario eapolinario removed the untriaged This issues has not yet been looked at by the Maintainers label Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request flytekit FlyteKit Python related issue
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants