You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The dots on a clivis that has a mora on each note are incorrectly placed right now. The dot for the first punctum should always be in the same vertical position it would be if that punctum were by itself, but positioned horizontally above the second dot. The second dot is already being positioned correctly.
Compare the output of Gregorio on this GABC:
(c4) ih(ih..) ig(ig..) if(if..) ie(ie..) id(id..) hg(hg..) hf(hf..) he(he..) hd(hd..)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bbloomf
pushed a commit
to bbloomf/exsurge
that referenced
this issue
Jun 1, 2016
The dots on a clivis that has a mora on each note are incorrectly placed right now. The dot for the first punctum should always be in the same vertical position it would be if that punctum were by itself, but positioned horizontally above the second dot. The second dot is already being positioned correctly.
Compare the output of Gregorio on this GABC:
(c4) ih(ih..) ig(ig..) if(if..) ie(ie..) id(id..) hg(hg..) hf(hf..) he(he..) hd(hd..)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: