You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
The way Hydra is set up right now pindel is locateded in the cnv_sv module, this results in that the pindel vcf is missed by VT and is not left aligned, normalized or decompose. The pindel vcf also does not have an AF or DP field in the INFO column. At least in Uppsala we are treating the pindel results more like a "normal" SNV caller and would prefer that the vcf is as similar as the vcfs coming out from snv_indels module (left aligned, decomposed, af-, dp-field etc).
Is normalization something everyone want or should i fix it locally for Uppsala?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can't really say I have a strong opinion on this since I don't have enough experience with these things, but instinctively I don't think that normalizing the output would be a bad thing.
A possible implementation could be to create modified versions of the relevant rules in the main snakefile, something like this:
Hi!
The way Hydra is set up right now pindel is locateded in the cnv_sv module, this results in that the pindel vcf is missed by VT and is not left aligned, normalized or decompose. The pindel vcf also does not have an AF or DP field in the INFO column. At least in Uppsala we are treating the pindel results more like a "normal" SNV caller and would prefer that the vcf is as similar as the vcfs coming out from snv_indels module (left aligned, decomposed, af-, dp-field etc).
Is normalization something everyone want or should i fix it locally for Uppsala?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: