You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 10, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hey, great work you all did! I really like it!
I have a problem though. After running python test_davis_videos.py --input=single_view, the result is downscaled to 288x512 (or, 288x1024, with the original and the result next to each other). But the original has a much higher resolution!
I found the resized_width and _height in the DAVISImageFolder class, but adjusting these made me run out of memory (CUDA) immediatly. I have a GTX 1070.
Is it really that intense? Or am I doing something wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The model is fairly heavy, but it obviously depends on the amount of RAM in your card. We haven't experimented with larger image resolutions. If you are looking for a higher resolution result, you might try upsampling the output using some kind of image-guided filter like https://johanneskopf.de/publications/jbu/
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hey, great work you all did! I really like it!
I have a problem though. After running
python test_davis_videos.py --input=single_view
, the result is downscaled to 288x512 (or, 288x1024, with the original and the result next to each other). But the original has a much higher resolution!I found the resized_width and _height in the DAVISImageFolder class, but adjusting these made me run out of memory (CUDA) immediatly. I have a GTX 1070.
Is it really that intense? Or am I doing something wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: