Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nucleus Wormhole Weights unbalanced #1

Open
stevenflo opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Nucleus Wormhole Weights unbalanced #1

stevenflo opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@stevenflo
Copy link

image

The code currently is unbalanced and favors more alphas in the nucleus. I propose an alternate weighting

const MAP_WORMHOLES = [
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 3, numBetas: 3} },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 3, numBetas: 2 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 2, numBetas: 3 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 3, numBetas: 1} },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 1, numBetas: 3 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 2, numBetas: 2 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 3, numBetas: 0 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 0, numBetas: 3 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 2, numBetas: 1 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 1, numBetas: 2 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 2, numBetas: 0 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 0, numBetas: 2 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 1, numBetas: 1 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 0, numBetas: 1 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 1, numBetas: 0 } },
{ weight: 1, value: { numAlphas: 0, numBetas: 0 } },
];

Global wormholes are currently being overrode by MAP_WORMHOLES as well. It should likely be the case that MAP_WORMHOLES should take priority.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant