Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider splitting up Channel.edit to have more concise per-type definitions #1053

Open
1 task done
FasterSpeeding opened this issue Mar 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

Consider splitting up Channel.edit to have more concise per-type definitions #1053

FasterSpeeding opened this issue Mar 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@FasterSpeeding
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Consider splitting up Channel.edit to have more concise per-type definitions.

Why is this needed?

This will make it more obvious what fields can be edited for a specific channel type

Ideal implementation

To be decided.

Checklist

  • I have searched the issue tracker and have made sure it's not a duplicate. If it is a follow up of another issue, I have specified it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@FasterSpeeding