You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the report, Coin Metrics researchers Lucas Nuzzi, Kyle Water, and Matias Andrade used a metric dubbed “Total Cost to Attack” (TCA) to determine how much it would cost these two blockchains exactly. As per the TCA data, the researchers noted that there are no profitable avenues for attacking Bitcoin and Ethereum.
“In none of the hypothesized attacks presented here [would the attacker] be able to profit by attacking Bitcoin or Ethereum. Consider that even in the most profitable double spend scenario presented, where the attacker could potentially make $1B after spending $40B, that would account for a 2.5% rate of return.”
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
In the report, Coin Metrics researchers Lucas Nuzzi, Kyle Water, and Matias Andrade used a metric dubbed “Total Cost to Attack” (TCA) to determine how much it would cost these two blockchains exactly. As per the TCA data, the researchers noted that there are no profitable avenues for attacking Bitcoin and Ethereum.
“In none of the hypothesized attacks presented here [would the attacker] be able to profit by attacking Bitcoin or Ethereum. Consider that even in the most profitable double spend scenario presented, where the attacker could potentially make $1B after spending $40B, that would account for a 2.5% rate of return.”
https://www.coinspeaker.com/51-attacks-bitcoin-ethereum-coin-metrics/
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions