Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 22, 2022. It is now read-only.

5001 port conflict with Cisco Anywhere Connect VPN #33

Closed
fliiteAI opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

5001 port conflict with Cisco Anywhere Connect VPN #33

fliiteAI opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
status/duplicate A question or request for support

Comments

@fliiteAI
Copy link

Out of the box install of IPFS will conflict with Cisco Anywhere Connect. In my particular case it was running on OSX Catalina. I had a standard install of the VPN software with not customizations. I downloaded IPFS Desktop and spent better part of a day tracking down why the daemon wouldn't start. On the enterprise front CISCO VPN software is pretty standard and this will get in the way of enterprise level deployments. I think the notifications should come front and center for non-computer science types so they understand they have a port conflict.
YMMV

@fliiteAI fliiteAI added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label May 18, 2020
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented May 18, 2020

Thank you for submitting your first issue to this repository! A maintainer will be here shortly to triage and review.
In the meantime, please double-check that you have provided all the necessary information to make this process easy! Any information that can help save additional round trips is useful! We currently aim to give initial feedback within two business days. If this does not happen, feel free to leave a comment.
Please keep an eye on how this issue will be labeled, as labels give an overview of priorities, assignments and additional actions requested by the maintainers:

  • "Priority" labels will show how urgent this is for the team.
  • "Status" labels will show if this is ready to be worked on, blocked, or in progress.
  • "Need" labels will indicate if additional input or analysis is required.

Finally, remember to use https://discuss.ipfs.io if you just need general support.

@Stebalien Stebalien added status/duplicate A question or request for support and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels May 18, 2020
@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

Ongoing discussion in ipfs/kubo#874.

@jessicaschilling
Copy link
Contributor

Let's keep tracking in ipfs/kubo#874 ... I'll close this here for the sake of avoiding duplication. Thanks!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status/duplicate A question or request for support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants