We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
False positive/noise :unused-locals warnings found in cases/testcases/testtest.clj also some similar ones in cases/testcases/suspicious.clj
Found by enabling :unused-locals linter in linters_test.clj for namespace testcases.testtest.
The last 2 are good warnings. For the first 3, it would be nicer if Eastwood did not report them. Not sure how difficult detecting those cases are.
{{:linter :unused-locals, :msg "let bound symbol 'G__<num>' never used", :file "testcases/testtest.clj", :line 124, :column 16} 1, {:linter :unused-locals, :msg "let bound symbol 'expr__<num>' never used", :file "testcases/testtest.clj", :line 125, :column 16} 1, {:linter :unused-locals, :msg "let bound symbol 'pred__<num>' never used", :file "testcases/testtest.clj", :line 125, :column 16} 1, {:linter :unused-locals, :msg "let bound symbol 'x' never used", :file "testcases/testtest.clj", :line 128, :column 27} 1, {:linter :unused-locals, :msg "let bound symbol 'x' never used", :file "testcases/testtest.clj", :line 129, :column 24} 2}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
False positive/noise :unused-locals warnings found in cases/testcases/testtest.clj
also some similar ones in cases/testcases/suspicious.clj
Found by enabling :unused-locals linter in linters_test.clj for namespace testcases.testtest.
The last 2 are good warnings. For the first 3, it would be nicer if Eastwood did not report them. Not sure how difficult detecting those cases are.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: