You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
django-reversion uses a JSON field to store a serialized version of the model fields. This in practice means that we would store our JSON payload inside another JSON field, which is kind of silly.
I therefore would suggest to rewrite the reversion functionality and add it to Cascade itself.
Side Note: The contributors of django-cms also want to remove support for reversion in their code base.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If django-cms removes reversion support, I see no reason why we should keep it. However, IMHO we should keep supporting reversion until we drop support for all django-cms releases that offer reversion support, unless keeping the reversion support is a big maintenance burden for us.
I am not so sure about adding versioning / undo support to cascade itself.
Can this live in a separate app?
What is django-cms's plan for the future? Switch to another solution, or drop reversion / undo support altogether?
django-reversion uses a JSON field to store a serialized version of the model fields. This in practice means that we would store our JSON payload inside another JSON field, which is kind of silly.
I therefore would suggest to rewrite the reversion functionality and add it to Cascade itself.
Side Note: The contributors of django-cms also want to remove support for reversion in their code base.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: