Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lengthier Physical Example #4

Open
privong opened this issue Oct 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Lengthier Physical Example #4

privong opened this issue Oct 17, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@privong
Copy link

privong commented Oct 17, 2020

This is following up on the post-talk discussion at RacketCon 2020...I like the idea of Leibniz and think it can solve an important problem in clearly/accurately communicating the details of scientific computation. But I am having trouble making the leap from the currently available examples to more complex examples that make it easier to understand/visualize how Leibniz could be used (e.g., in a publication). I wonder if an example of a "classic" algorithm (such as the Barnes & Hut treecode for N-body simulations) might help bridge this gap?

@khinsen
Copy link
Owner

khinsen commented Oct 18, 2020

Thanks for the suggestion. Barnes & Hut looks like a nice example indeed. In the current state of Leibniz, it would probably be unwelcomingly long, because it would have to start with definitions of "collection of particles" plus all its operations (adding, removing, merging, iterating, ...). That's one of the most urgent extensions from my point of view: basic collections should be built-in. If/when that is done, Barnes & Hut should become quite straightforward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants