Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Process Semantics (2.1.1) could benefit from more illustrative examples of the concepts it introduces #231

Open
Gohlub opened this issue Jun 29, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Gohlub
Copy link

Gohlub commented Jun 29, 2024

I feel that 2.1.1 can benefit from having examples (or references to the implementation of the concept in question) in relation to the concept it introduces. Handling process state, for example, references only 2.6, which outlines the vfs structure, not how really process state is handled. The overall chapter can benefit from more examples on almost all of the things introduced.

@dr-frmr
Copy link
Member

dr-frmr commented Jul 1, 2024

Thanks for the comment. I agree we can improve this a lot. Will be working on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants