-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate CronJob deployment approach #1340
Comments
Hi @knelasevero , if this approach is being actively considered, I would like to contribute in any way possible. Kindly let me know :) |
First step would be implementing a |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
Where can I read about these proposals? I'm very interested in a descheduler controller - Instead of implementing my own, I'd rather work towards a proposed and agreed upon approach |
The downside of a single pod running as a controller is, that descheduler stops if the node where the descheduler runs is going down. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
This came up during community meeting of Jan 16 2024. Since there are some proposals to change descheduler to more of a controller than it is right now, with long running implications, maybe supporting the CronJob deployment approach isn't great for us in the future.
One of the reasons why folks use the CronJob approach is to have more control over which time the evictions are performed, as it happens here: #1338
I remember getting questions from people asking the same thing (how to run it only at night). So before deprecating it might also be good to add a feature to better control intervals between loops with a cron like semantics.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: