Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model Buildings.ThermalZones.EnergyPlus_9_6_0.Examples.SmallOffice.IdealHeatingCoolingWinter fails verification #3963

Open
AndreaBartolini opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@AndreaBartolini
Copy link
Contributor

The variable ECoo.y of the model Buildings.ThermalZones.EnergyPlus_9_6_0.Examples.SmallOffice.IdealHeatingCoolingWinter fails the verification vs the Dymola reference file.
That variables integrates the sum of the five outputs coo[x].conPID.y in coo block, each one multiplied by a gain, and the signals coo[x].conPID.y pass the verification.

Detailed analysis is available in OpenModelica/OpenModelica#12809

The question here is to decide if the accumulation of the errors of the signals coo[x].conPID.y (multiplied by the relevant gains) shall or not be verified vs the Dymola reference file, maybe this verification is too hard to get by using different compilers and solvers.

Keeping @casella in the loop.

@JayHuLBL JayHuLBL self-assigned this Aug 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants