Julia 1.x

[cortner]

I've started updating the Julia packages to 1.x. The new package manager looks very impressive and should make it much easier to maintain a well-defined reproducible Julia environment. This was my main motivation since I had such trouble over the past few months reproducing my results.

Q1: is everybody who is affected happy for me to add Julia 1.x to this docker image?

Q2: presumably Julia v0.6.4 should still remain in the image.

Anything else I should think about before trying this out?

[gabor1]

Great, let's do it.

…

-- Gábor

On 18 Feb 2019, at 17:55, Christoph Ortner ***@***.***> wrote: I've started updating the Julia packages to 1.x. The new package manager looks very impressive and should make it much easier to maintain a well-defined reproducible Julia environment. This was my main motivation since I had such trouble over the past few months reproducing my results. Q1: is everybody who is affected happy for me to add Julia 1.x to this docker image? Q2: presumably Julia v0.6.4 should still remain in the image. Anything else I should think about before trying this out? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[cortner]

Ok - let me ask differently - apart from Cas, who is using The Julia component of the docker

[gabor1]

:-) I often do

…

-- Gábor

On 18 Feb 2019, at 19:14, Christoph Ortner ***@***.***> wrote: Ok - let me ask differently - apart from Cas, who is using The Julia component of the docker — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[cortner]

then I suppose it needs a mechanism to keep both Julia versions. Do you want 0.6.4 to be the default or 1.1.x?

[gabor1]

I don't mind, as long as both are there.

…

-- Gábor

On 18 Feb 2019, at 19:26, Christoph Ortner ***@***.***> wrote: then I suppose it needs a mechanism to keep both Julia versions. Do you want 0.6.4 to be the default or 1.1.x? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[cortner]

@cortner @jameskermode I accidentally pushed my changes to libatoms instead of a fork. Given this is not my repository, I don't want to risk undoing this push.

Anyhow, this is ready to try out, as far as I can tell everything is working as I expect (better actually). Also look at the README at JuLibAtoms when you have a moment.