Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I totally agree - a UI based configuration would be very nice. But there are so many configuration options already that I think this is simply not possible - at least if we want to have exactly the same functionality as today. What I can imagine is an intermediate step: I think that the sensor configuration could be made optional if WCS creates some sensors by default: But I don't not have good answer for some issues:
Maybe the way to go is a to offer a subset of the functionality via the UI and the power-users have to use text based configuration. But where is the border line? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You might want to take a look here: #2068 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
All said in the title - and saying (wishing) is easy, but the implementation for sure is quite some work.
Anyway, that would open this great integration to a much broader group of users.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions