Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.7.5 Extractive industry not in use #37

Open
obrl-soil opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

3.7.5 Extractive industry not in use #37

obrl-soil opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@obrl-soil
Copy link

Classes 1.4.2 and 2.8.3 cover land undergoing rehabilitation in natural or agricultural contexts; could this be more consistently captured as a similar class within 3.9.0 ? Previous land use would then be needed to split out, say, industrial land rehab (petrol stations, gas plants, etc) from mining rehab.

For signifying land under a mining consent, it would seem more appropriate to capture consents of various kinds as an attribute side by side with tenure, and then capture the actual rather than intended use of the land at the time of observation.

@obrl-soil
Copy link
Author

Rehabilitation status (active, passive, none) could be another useful attribute.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants