Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How does the random flip works in Losses for pseudo exemplar pairs #24

Open
neew123 opened this issue Oct 24, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

How does the random flip works in Losses for pseudo exemplar pairs #24

neew123 opened this issue Oct 24, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@neew123
Copy link

neew123 commented Oct 24, 2020

I try to train CoCosNet in my own dataset,but i find it is random to get the right result because of the probability of flip?.So I want to ask How does the random flip works in Losses for pseudo exemplar pairs?if I choose the exempalr no filp, this difference can influence the final result? Thanks for your answering.

@panzhang0212
Copy link
Contributor

Random flip is a kind of method to generate pseudo exemplar pairs. Other augmentations, e.g. geometry affine translation, random flow, could also be used to generate pseudo exemplar pairs. During the test phase, flip or not could not influence the final result.

@neew123
Copy link
Author

neew123 commented Nov 2, 2020

Random flip is a kind of method to generate pseudo exemplar pairs. Other augmentations, e.g. geometry affine translation, random flow, could also be used to generate pseudo exemplar pairs. During the test phase, flip or not could not influence the final result.

Thanks for your answering,actually ,when I use CoCosNet train on my own edge-to-image dataset,The first twenty iterations it can generate good results,but when after twenty iterations,the result is the same as exemplar but not use edge image.So,I want to ask If the probablity of flip can affect the final results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants