You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Object Centric OVD, the authors use the checkpoint trained from a subset of LMDet which has no overlap with any of the evaluation datasets. However, it seems that the checkpoint MDef_DETR_r101_epoch20.pth mentioned in Issue#22 is trained with the full dataset as it is the same checkpoint in evaluation. Thus the checkpoint used to generate class-agnostic proposals is needed to prevent leaking information. Please let me know if I missed anything. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
is the checkpoint named MDef_DETR_r101_epoch20_ore.pth? This checkpoint is trained on a filtered dataset generated by removing all captions from LMDet listing any of the 60 unknown categories evaluated in ORE. I'm curious if this will stiil include the rare classes in the LVIS dataset.
In Object Centric OVD, the authors use the checkpoint trained from a subset of LMDet which has no overlap with any of the evaluation datasets. However, it seems that the checkpoint
MDef_DETR_r101_epoch20.pth
mentioned in Issue#22 is trained with the full dataset as it is the same checkpoint in evaluation. Thus the checkpoint used to generate class-agnostic proposals is needed to prevent leaking information. Please let me know if I missed anything. Thank you.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: