An ability rule will override a previous one. For example, let's say we want the user to be able to do everything to projects except destroy them.
This is the correct way:
can :manage, Project
cannot :destroy, Project
It is important that the cannot :destroy
line comes after the can :manage
line. If they were reversed, cannot :destroy
would be overridden by can :manage
.
Adding can
rules do not override prior rules, but instead are logically or'ed.
can :manage, Project, user_id: user.id
can :update, Project do |project|
!project.locked?
end
For the above, can? :update
will always return true if the user_id
equals user.id
, even if the project is locked.
This is also important when dealing with roles which have inherited behavior. For example, let's say we have two roles, moderator and admin. We want the admin to inherit the moderator's behavior.
if user.role? :moderator
can :manage, Project
cannot :destroy, Project
can :manage, Comment
end
if user.role? :admin
can :destroy, Project
end
Here it is important the admin role be after the moderator so it can override the cannot
behavior to give the admin more permissions. See Role Based Authorization.
If you are not getting the behavior you expect, please post an issue.