-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consistent use of CFE_EVS_EventType_Enum_t
(and clarify vs mask)
#1398
Labels
Comments
skliper
added
the
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
label
Apr 20, 2021
This allows the label to be printed for the value (naming convention), so it makes sense to have this for ENUM but not for general types. |
CCB:2021-04-21 Discussed |
skliper
removed
the
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
label
Apr 21, 2021
skliper
changed the title
Consistent use of May 25, 2021
CFE_EVS_EventType_Enum_t
only used in 1 location, no CFE_EVS_EventID_t
type...CFE_EVS_EventType_Enum_t
(and clarify vs mask)
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Numerous locations where EventType is declared as uint16, but there's a defined type
CFE_EVS_EventType_Enum_t
Describe the solution you'd like
Use CFE_EVS_EventType_Enum_t everywhere
Describe alternatives you've considered
Use uint16 everywhere
Additional context
Code review
#1447 - need to sort out enum vs mask use
Requester Info
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: