You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The package approval time seems to be at least partly a function of the functionality in the deployed packages (certainly in the case of cluster creation) and of the time it takes for the KPT functions in the package pipeline to run in the case of PackageVariants.
For the end to end tests, we could perhaps do some operations in parallel (such as creating the regional, edge01, and edge02 clusters), but this could load the test infrastructure.
Regarding PackageVariantSets and PackageVariants, care should be taken by the developers of these packages to take care to design efficient kpt functions so that the package approval time is not too slow.
Regarding this issue, in the Porch architecture for R3, the package approval time cannot easily be improved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The package approval time is long for packages in Porch, especially for packages with complex KPT pipelines and PackageVariantSets.
This issue should be addressed in Porch:
See also:
#462
The package approval time seems to be at least partly a function of the functionality in the deployed packages (certainly in the case of cluster creation) and of the time it takes for the KPT functions in the package pipeline to run in the case of PackageVariants.
For the end to end tests, we could perhaps do some operations in parallel (such as creating the regional, edge01, and edge02 clusters), but this could load the test infrastructure.
Regarding PackageVariantSets and PackageVariants, care should be taken by the developers of these packages to take care to design efficient kpt functions so that the package approval time is not too slow.
Regarding this issue, in the Porch architecture for R3, the package approval time cannot easily be improved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: