You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've seen your comments on weak or untextured datasets in a lot of issues. I am currently ranging sea surface targets, and do not use the pre-trained model to train from 0, I found that the loss of the model at the beginning is very small (10e-6 level), but the overall loss is still showing a downward trend, please ask if this model is suitable for the use of this scenario, the following is the dataset picture and the loss picture. And I found that the output of your model is between 0.1-100, not the real depth value, if I need to output the real depth value (distance value) what should I do?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've seen your comments on weak or untextured datasets in a lot of issues. I am currently ranging sea surface targets, and do not use the pre-trained model to train from 0, I found that the loss of the model at the beginning is very small (10e-6 level), but the overall loss is still showing a downward trend, please ask if this model is suitable for the use of this scenario, the following is the dataset picture and the loss picture. And I found that the output of your model is between 0.1-100, not the real depth value, if I need to output the real depth value (distance value) what should I do?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: