-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 299
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Old README was better #104
Comments
I liked the ability to scroll through various sections. now I need to load different pages of the github wiki? the amount of wasted time flipping through that is quite cumbersome for no reason. loading all the text at once is way faster than clicking wiki pages that need to load each page every single time. seriously there are faster websites than github's bloated mess. Old readme was miles better. Instead I now need to copy and paste all the various sections into my own personal notes and periodically check if there are changes in the wiki. |
Changing the README was necessary because many new features have been added to Ligolo-ng and making a single page would make the documentation unreadable.
Do I need to remind you that this is an OpenSource project, and that, in addition to using Git, which gives you access to the old Readme, I benevolently maintain it? I'm going to make some changes to the README/documentation, so that it's clearer, but please stop behaving as if you'd paid for this software. |
In my opinion, GitHub doesn't offer the User Interface/Experience for a wiki. However, I understand your sentiment that you wished to have easier time to make changes to different sections of the old read me and came up with the wiki idea. I hope for better, but sometimes I guess I need to just do it myself. I already wrote a program to take advantage of cloning the wiki and python to parse the content from GitHub's wiki to condense back into a singular markdown file.(at least GitHub has the ability to clone the wiki) I appreciate your great software, spectacular programming prowess. just not my cup of tea GitHub's wiki implementation is in the current state when it comes to multiple pages. |
Not a single person here is behaving as if they had paid for this software. Thank you for linking the old readme, I appreciate it and as maybe so many others. Including a simple "how-to" is certainly more approachable than a wiki. That being said, I don't believe there's any reason to become seemingly angry / annoyed with this reaction. |
@ReKon64 Your issue was clear and completely understandable, and didn't annoy me. What annoyed me was the comments that were added to this issue, arguing why the old internet was better. I am reopening this issue for follow-up. |
Describe the solution you'd like
Bring old README back. It was clearer than the wiki. It was literally perfect tutorial.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: