Number only allows for Singapore number.

[nobodyishappy]

What if the user that you are trying to add in from another country and does not have a Singapore number? For example, he is a international student that is just here for exchange.

[nus-se-bot]

Team's Response

No details provided by team.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Phone number restriction is restrictive for international users.

Description: According to the user guide, the value proposition is that "CCA Manager is a contact manager designed to simplify the management of CCAs and enhance your administrative efficiency, regardless of whether you're overseeing a sports team, academic club, any other extracurricular activity, or simply a CCA participant," where it does not specify that this produce is specifically for the schools in Singapore, nor it is stated in the UG/DG as a restriction. As an international student from South Korea, I want to manage the CCA and members with this product but it disallows adding other valid international phone numbers as an input. Since this could hinder the international users / users with different nationality from using this product without stated in the value proposition or restriction in the UG, I classified this as a feature flaw.

Stepts to reproduce: add n/John Doe p/01067136414 e/[email protected] a/6 Sin Ming #1-01 (phone number is valid South Korea's phone number (it is my phone number))

Expected: New person added (with the details on this person)

Actual: Phone numbers should only contain numbers, and it should be 8 digits long according to Singapore mobile number format which starts with 8 or 9.

---

_{[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#1473] [original labels: severity.Low type.FeatureFlaw]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

We did not emphasize that phone numbers have to be Singaporean phone number that starts with either 8 or 9 in our UG

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---