Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation issue with the proposed implementation #21

Open
nobodyishappy opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Documentation issue with the proposed implementation #21

nobodyishappy opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@nobodyishappy
Copy link
Owner

nobodyishappy commented Apr 19, 2024

image.png

The mete-feature portion is said to contain two parts but only one part is listed in the list. Is the second part meant to be the modification of UI elements?

@nus-se-script
Copy link

nus-se-script commented Apr 22, 2024

Team's Response

Same issue.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

An implemented feature still has [Proposed] prefix.

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.



Found on page 14 of DG.


[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#1913] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Valid and can be seen in the DG.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I agree that it is the same section of the text being covered. But, the context of the error is different. The original bug is covering the part where the title of the text has a [Proposed] tag. However, I mention that there is a missing part in the numbering of the list.


❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.VeryLow]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants