You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there. I've been wanting to use obsidian-html to convert my technical Obsidian notes to HTML so I can easily share with my colleagues. I noticed that it seems like the $$ Latex math block format that the conversion wants looks like.
$$F_\beta = f(I_\beta)$$
however in my notes I have it in the format.
$$F_\beta = f(I_\beta)$$
sometimes directly follow plain text, or sometimes on a new line. Both give the same strange result, which looks like the math equation but inline and surrounded by plaintext \( and \)
So
bla bla $$F_\beta = f(I_\beta)$$
becomes
and
bla bla
$$F_\beta = f(I_\beta)$$
becomes
Is this something that can be easily solved in your code? I find that using $$ inline with an equation is better for readability and searching through my notes. It would be a slog to convert all the instances where I used it like that, so I'm hoping something could change in the conversion process.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On version 3.5.2 having text in the same block as a $$ equation causes this problem, e.g. with
test.md:
# Work## 1.
text
$$1+1=2$$
text
## 2.
text
$$1+1=2$$
text
# Don't work## 1.
text
$$1+1=2$$
text
## 2.
text
$$1+1=2$$
text
## 3.
text
$$1+1=2$$
text
## 4.
text $$1+1=2$$ text
Hi there. I've been wanting to use obsidian-html to convert my technical Obsidian notes to HTML so I can easily share with my colleagues. I noticed that it seems like the
$$
Latex math block format that the conversion wants looks like.however in my notes I have it in the format.
$$F_\beta = f(I_\beta)$$
sometimes directly follow plain text, or sometimes on a new line. Both give the same strange result, which looks like the math equation but inline and surrounded by plaintext
\(
and\)
So
bla bla $$F_\beta = f(I_\beta)$$
becomes
and
bla bla $$F_\beta = f(I_\beta)$$
becomes
Is this something that can be easily solved in your code? I find that using
$$
inline with an equation is better for readability and searching through my notes. It would be a slog to convert all the instances where I used it like that, so I'm hoping something could change in the conversion process.Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: