Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we be using dates with 4-digit year format instead of 2-digit? #42

Open
pacharanero opened this issue Jan 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@pacharanero
Copy link
Contributor

pacharanero commented Jan 15, 2018

image

2-digit year formats went out in 1999 for good, right?

Reasons not to do this:

  • 2 digits inceases the possible confusion space, for example a DOB of 12-Jan-11 would be valid either way around, whereas representing it as 12-Jan-2011 is unambiguous.
  • Microsoft Health CUI suggests use day(number)-month(3-letter-contraction)-year(4-digit number)

I haven't yet looked to see if this formatting is purely Odonto-RMS or if it's coming in from Opal

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant