-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bug ?] coordinate points json schema discrepency? #150
Comments
perhaps related, {
"typeOfUncertainty": {
"_instruction": "Add the type of uncertainty used for this quantitative value.",
"_linkedTypes": [
"https://openminds.ebrains.eu/controlledTerms/TypeOfUncertainty"
],
"description": "Distinct technique used to quantify the uncertainty of a measurement.",
"title": "typeOfUncertainty"
}
}
|
Re second issue (quoted below), I seem to have gleamed some additional information. It appears the If that is the case, shouldn't the openminds generator actually populate the schema? Yes it will signficantly increase the size of the json schema, but it is not designed to be human readable any way? in the html generated, it can still rely on the
|
@xgui3783 thanks for this issue. For the For the |
@olinux did you have a look yet? |
per https://github.com/HumanBrainProject/openMINDS_SANDS/blob/3602c70/schemas/miscellaneous/coordinatePoint.schema.tpl.json#L8-L16 and https://humanbrainproject.github.io/openMINDS/v3/SANDS/v3/miscellaneous/coordinatePoint.html , it seems
CoordinatePoint > coordinates
should be of type array, with at least 2, at most 3 items, of typequalitativeValue
.But the generated json schema seems to suggest that it is a single object of type
qualitativeValue
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: