[GR-56345] Provide an espresso-runtime-<RuntimeResourceId>
with UPL or GPL as the LICENSE?
#9382
Labels
espresso-runtime-<RuntimeResourceId>
with UPL or GPL as the LICENSE?
#9382
Feature request
Please include the following information:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. E.g. I'm always frustrated when [...]
espresso-runtime-<RuntimeResourceId>
related Maven dependency asRuntimeResourceId
. This sounds similar to,org.graalvm.espresso:espresso-runtime-resources-linux-amd64:24.0.1
isGNU General Public License, version 2
, butorg.graalvm.espresso:espresso-runtime-resources-linux-amd64:24.0.2
isGraalVM Free Terms and Conditions (GFTC) including License for Early Adopter Versions
. But it looks like the onlyespresso-runtime-<RuntimeResourceId>
isorg.graalvm.espresso:espresso-runtime-resources-linux-amd64
. I don't see a description of the LICENSE changes in the CHANGELOG , so I'm assuming I'm actually missing some documentation?Describe the solution you'd like.
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
espresso-runtime-<RuntimeResourceId>
with UPL or GPL as the LICENSE.Describe who do you think will benefit the most.
GraalVM users, GraalVM contributors, developers of libraries and frameworks which depend on GraalVM, or somebody else?
Describe alternatives you've considered.
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context.
Add any other context about the feature request here.
For example, link to the relevant projects, documentation, standards.
Express whether you'd like to help contributing this feature
If you'd like to contribute, please read the contribution guide.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: