-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
False positive lone pole or tower #2209
Comments
Ok, let's ignore this poles with |
In fact I am not sure to understand what you ask for. An alone pole with cc @flacombe |
"In fact I am not sure to understand what you ask for." "It is example of pole with transformator (sic) which is connected to primary and secondary voltage undergroud (sic)." What's being asked for is simple. Stop incorrectly flagging power poles which have transformers on them and all cabling leading to them underground as errors. They are not errors. Without access to data from the power company in question showing the location of the underground cabling there is no realistic way to map the distribution lines leading to and from them. Therefore it is utterly unreasonable to mark them as errors. |
Hello The whole facility should be tagged as |
It is example of pole with transformator which is connected to primary and secondary voltage undergroud.
it is very often type of connection.
it is node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11215506651
I map it as:
line_management: transition
location:transition: yes
but osmose mark it as error Lone power tower or pole
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: