You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have my private API, and I would like to create a API for my partners.
The Two api does not have the same deprecation policies: for the private I can introduce breaking change because in the same release I am updating the webapp accordingly.
But for the partner I need to have an extended deprecation policy, up to 3 months.
So, I created a Partner schema with some requests and mutations. that's fine and meet my goals.
But If the two schemas shares the same type (i.e. User) I don't know how to configure GraphqlBundle to tell that types for default schema are in directory config/graphql/types/default and types for schema partner are in directory config/graphql/types/partner, so my internal type can evoluate differently
In fact, I think it is not possible for now.
Any ideas of how I can do that ? And if not, Is it a feature easy for me to implement as a PR ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello all,
I have my private API, and I would like to create a API for my partners.
The Two api does not have the same deprecation policies: for the private I can introduce breaking change because in the same release I am updating the webapp accordingly.
But for the partner I need to have an extended deprecation policy, up to 3 months.
So, I created a Partner schema with some requests and mutations. that's fine and meet my goals.
But If the two schemas shares the same type (i.e. User) I don't know how to configure GraphqlBundle to tell that types for
default
schema are in directoryconfig/graphql/types/default
and types for schemapartner
are in directoryconfig/graphql/types/partner
, so my internal type can evoluate differentlyIn fact, I think it is not possible for now.
Any ideas of how I can do that ? And if not, Is it a feature easy for me to implement as a PR ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: