SOS libraries should be combined and renamed

[tom95858]

Hi @morrone, @baallan,

The SOS libraries need to be moved to $pkglibdir and renamed to avoid collision with existing libraries.

I am fairly certain that RHEL, at least, has a libsos library already. If $pkglibdir is /usr/lib[64] this will cause collisions with -lsos.

If we are not satisfied with requiring -L$pkglibdir/sos -lsos or something like (we have already litigated the inevitability of library name collision discussion) then libsos needs a new name. SOS is independent of LDMS/OVIS so libldms_sos, etc... gives me pause.

I'll need to propose a new name that is unique and doesn't give the undue impression of dependency. But overall, I think we are at:

$pkglibdir/lib[new_name].so
$pkglibdir/[new_name]_plugins

[baallan]

@tom95858 I thought you had already shifted to sosdb for packaging. That seems fine for lib name too. Though by convention if the configure.ac package is sosdb, then (e.g. rhel)
libdir is /usr/lib64 and pkglibdir is /usr/lib64/sosdb.

[tom95858]

Hi @baallan, yes libsosdb.so seems like a reasonable name