We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WITH_FREELISTS
As we discussed at https://discuss.python.org/t/should-we-remove-the-with-freelists-macro, we just added this macro to test mimalloc's own feature without using our own free list implementation. See: #89685
But since we already implemented per thread freelist at the #111968 for freethreading, we don't need this flag anymore.
per thread freelist
I will remove this macro during this year's core sprint (only around two weeks left) https://discuss.python.org/t/2024-core-dev-sprint-in-bellevue-wa-september-23-27/39227
cc @colesbury @vstinner @markshannon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pythongh-123990: Good bye WITH_FREELISTS macro
f174e55
gh-123990: Good bye WITH_FREELISTS macro (gh-124358)
ad7c778
corona10
No branches or pull requests
As we discussed at https://discuss.python.org/t/should-we-remove-the-with-freelists-macro,
we just added this macro to test mimalloc's own feature without using our own free list implementation.
See: #89685
But since we already implemented
per thread freelist
at the #111968 for freethreading, we don't need this flag anymore.I will remove this macro during this year's core sprint (only around two weeks left)
https://discuss.python.org/t/2024-core-dev-sprint-in-bellevue-wa-september-23-27/39227
cc @colesbury @vstinner @markshannon
Linked PRs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: