You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The way the output is returned currently is well suited for LDPC codes, but suppose I just want to generate bipartite graphs, without a constraint / variable association. For this all vertices should be labelled uniquely. This would also be compatible with how graph libraries like igraph or networkx read graph data.
So if we have N vertices in the "left" part and M vertices in the "right" part, label indices should be unique integers in the range 0,...,M+N-1, where the first N correspond to "left" and the next M correspond to "right".
Even if one "forgets" that "left" / "right" vertex indices come first / last, the bipartition can be recovered in linear time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The way the output is returned currently is well suited for LDPC codes, but suppose I just want to generate bipartite graphs, without a constraint / variable association. For this all vertices should be labelled uniquely. This would also be compatible with how graph libraries like igraph or networkx read graph data.
So if we have N vertices in the "left" part and M vertices in the "right" part, label indices should be unique integers in the range 0,...,M+N-1, where the first N correspond to "left" and the next M correspond to "right".
Even if one "forgets" that "left" / "right" vertex indices come first / last, the bipartition can be recovered in linear time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: