Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Licence missing from the project #45

Open
attila16881 opened this issue Jul 18, 2017 · 9 comments
Open

Licence missing from the project #45

attila16881 opened this issue Jul 18, 2017 · 9 comments

Comments

@attila16881
Copy link

Hi All,
I was looking for the specifications but I cannot find any reference to licence or IP of the HATS specifications/requirements, EEPROM design requirements, etc.

Could you please clarify and also add it to the project page?

Thanks!

@nicola-lunghi
Copy link
Contributor

any news on this?

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

JamesH65 commented Sep 1, 2017

@jimbojr Can you comment on this?

@jimbojr
Copy link
Contributor

jimbojr commented Sep 1, 2017

I'm afraid I don't understand the question - what exactly is missing?
EEPROM requirements are specified in the design guide https://github.com/raspberrypi/hats/blob/master/designguide.md

@nicola-lunghi
Copy link
Contributor

Hi
the license for the source code of the tools.
Without it as stated here
https://www.infoworld.com/article/2615869/open-source-software/github-needs-to-take-open-source-seriously.html

"Code without an explicit license is protected by copyright and is by default All Rights Reserved. The person or people who wrote the code are protected as such. Any time you're using software you didn't write, licensing should be considered and abided."

So practically if I want to modify/improve the code, add extension, fork it and so on I cannot do that.

Regards
Nicola Lunghi

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

JamesH65 commented Sep 4, 2017

Which tools are you specifically talking about? The Linux kernel is clearly open source GPL licenced so that is in the clear. I believe all the Pi specific userland code is GPL licenced also, or at least has a permissive licence. All the source code files should have the licence at the top.

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

JamesH65 commented Sep 4, 2017

Ah, OK, I'll try and get that sorted. Although you are perfectly entitled to use them, just that redistribution rights are not particularly clear.

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

JamesH65 commented Sep 4, 2017

There should now be a license file in there, can you check it is adequate for your needs?

@nicola-lunghi
Copy link
Contributor

Yes is ok!
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants