You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the third step, I am saving the same object as in the first. Normally, if it is the same as the most recent, it is not rewritten.
I would like to use pins to track data objects produced by a research pipeline, in which I might change branches to try out different features. With the current behavior, a new object will be saved every time I rerun a pipeline after switching branches, which is unnecessary file duplication.
To fix this (which could be through an option setting), pin_write should check the hash not only for the last version, but for all cached versions. Then to make sure that pin_read() will work correctly, it would need to update the "created" field (or perhaps a new "reactivated" field?) so that the appropriate version is considered the most recent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Let's use this issue to collect thoughts on this type of change. There isn't a great workaround right now for your particular use case because it is hard for folks to manually check the hash themselves ahead of writing; pins:::pin_hash() is both unexported and uses paths as the arg, which isn't entirely easy for a user to get at.
I was surprised by this behavior:
Created on 2024-04-22 with reprex v2.1.0
In the third step, I am saving the same object as in the first. Normally, if it is the same as the most recent, it is not rewritten.
I would like to use pins to track data objects produced by a research pipeline, in which I might change branches to try out different features. With the current behavior, a new object will be saved every time I rerun a pipeline after switching branches, which is unnecessary file duplication.
To fix this (which could be through an option setting), pin_write should check the hash not only for the last version, but for all cached versions. Then to make sure that pin_read() will work correctly, it would need to update the "created" field (or perhaps a new "reactivated" field?) so that the appropriate version is considered the most recent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: